Department of Health and Human Services logo  Skip ACF banner navigation
Questions?  
Privacy  
Site Index  
Contact Us  
   ACF Home   |   Services   |   Working with ACF   |   Policy/Planning   |   About ACF   |   ACF News Search  
Administration for Children and Families US Department of Health and Human Services
Error processing SSI file

1999 Report Home | Table of Contents | Previous Chapter | Next Chapter

Evaluating Head Start:
A Recommended Framework for Studying the Impact of the Head Start Program
Chapter 1

Overview

Head Start provides comprehensive early child development services to low-income children, their families, and communities. Since 1965, the program-enjoying bipartisan support-has served nearly 18 million children and their families (Administration on Children, Youth and Families, 1998), providing preschool-aged children with education, nutritious meals, and access to health, mental health, and social services that support their early development. Further, the program has influenced the development and direction of a broad range of early child development services across the nation through its role as a national laboratory. The program has provided support to low-income families seeking enriching experiences for their children, and it has provided direction and leadership to the fields of early child development and education.

With increased attention to outcomes and accountability for federal resources (Government Performance and Results Act of 1993)2, the Head Start program has been challenged to document its effectiveness in new ways. A series of reports from the U.S. General Accounting Office (U.S. GAO, 1997; U.S. GAO, 1998) and concern among congressional leaders about the lack of rigorous experimental designs testing the effectiveness of the program caused Congress to specifically call for the formation of an independent panel of experts to review and make recommendations on the design of a study or studies that provide a "national analysis" of the impact of the Head Start program (Head Start Amendments of 1998).

The Head Start Amendments of 1998 provide specific guidance about how Congress envisions impact research on Head Start. For example, the legislation calls for research that "uses rigorous methodological designs and techniques (based on the recommendations of the expert panel), including longitudinal designs, control groups, nationally recognized standardized measures, and random selection and assignment, as appropriate." The legislation states that "the research shall be conducted as a single comprehensive assessment or as a group of coordinated assessments designed to provide, when taken together, a national analysis of the impact of Head Start programs." The legislation states that the assessment or coordinated assessments include "comparisons of individuals who participate in Head Start programs with control groups (including comparison groups) composed of (i) individuals who participate in other early childhood programs (such as public or private preschool programs and day care); and (ii) individuals who do not participate in any other early childhood program." Impact is defined as "a difference in an outcome for a participant in the program that would not have occurred without the participation in the program" and is to be examined at three points in time: "on the date participants leave Head Start programs; at the end of kindergarten; and at the end of first grade." The final report of the research study or studies is to be transmitted to Congress by September 30, 2003 (Head Start Amendments of 1998).

The Advisory Committee on Head Start Research and Evaluation

On March 23, 1999, the Department of Health and Human Services Secretary signed the Charter establishing the Advisory Committee on Head Start Research and Evaluation. The Charter reiterates the requirements spelled out in the Head Start Amendments, as amended by the 1998 reauthorization. It also states that as part of the process, the Committee shall:

  • Review existing and ongoing research and evaluation studies that document the impact of Head Start programs;

  • Assess the benefits and feasibility of alternative research designs and techniques to determine if, overall, Head Start programs have impacts consistent with their primary goal of promoting school readiness by enhancing the social and cognitive development of low-income children;

  • Report to the Secretary on recommendations for a study or studies of the impact of Head Start services, including appropriate designs, techniques, methods of analysis, and consideration of sources of variation;

  • Advise the Secretary on the progress of the study or studies of the impacts of Head Start programs; and

  • Review and comment to the Secretary, if the Committee so desires, on the first and second interim and final impact study reports of the organization(s) selected for carrying out the independent research.

The Advisory Committee includes 30 individuals with expertise in areas of program evaluation and research, education, early childhood care and education, policy, and economics. Many of the Committee members have a long and rich involvement with Head Start and other early childhood programs; other members are new to Head Start but have extensive backgrounds in research methodology. A biographical sketch of each Committee member is included at the end of this report. The Committee is chaired by Olivia A. Golden, Ph.D., Assistant Secretary for Children and Families of the Department of Health and Human Services.

The Committee met in April, June, and July 1999 in order to fulfill the first phase of the Committee's charge: issuing recommendations to the Secretary for a study or studies that provide a national analysis of the impact of Head Start. In addition to these meetings, individual Committee members volunteered to draft design and issue papers that were circulated between meetings and helped the Committee reach the conclusions that are included in this report. All meeting agendas and papers prepared by Committee members were posted on the Department's web page for public access.

The deliberations were thoughtful and intense. Overall, the Committee finds the complexity of the task very challenging: Committee members recognize that there is no simple design for measuring the impact of Head Start. Some design choices threaten external validity (i.e., representativeness or the ability to generalize from study participants to the Head Start population as a whole); others threaten internal validity (i.e., causality or the ability to attribute observed outcomes to participation in Head Start). Some research designs would require changes in the practices and procedures for enrolling the most needy children in Head Start; other designs would require that services be denied to eligible children. Deciding precisely what to recommend, primarily as it relates to the trade-offs between external and internal validity, was a challenging task for the Committee.

This report-the first phase of the Committee's work-represents the deliberations of the Committee and its recommendations to the Secretary regarding a framework for studying the impact of Head Start. Chapters include:

  • The Growth of Head Start and Other Early Childhood Options. This chapter provides background information on the growth of Head Start and other early childhood options that Committee members considered as they discussed the most credible and feasible methods for measuring the impact of Head Start.

  • Previous and Current Research on Head Start and Early Childhood. This chapter summarizes findings from previous research on Head Start and other early childhood studies, and outlines the components of the current Head Start research agenda that provide information about impact, quality, and outcomes.

  • Recommended Framework for Studying the Impact of Head Start. This chapter reflects deliberations of the Committee related to its charge-issuing recommendations to the Secretary regarding the design of an impact study (or set of coordinated assessments) of Head Start. Thus, it includes the research questions, criteria, outcomes, measurement issues, and overall research design recommended by the Committee.

  • Rationale for the Recommendations: Addressing Key Challenges. This chapter highlights challenges for designing an impact study or studies of Head Start that influence the generalizability of the findings and the ability to determine causality. Members of the Committee believe that with careful planning and ongoing consideration, these challenges could be addressed in an impact study or set of studies.

  • Next Steps: Implementing the Recommendations. This chapter outlines specific steps for the Department of Health and Human Services to take in carrying out a plan for studying the impact of Head Start.

 

 

 

2The Government Performance and Results Act of 1993 requires Federal agencies to establish standards measuring their performance and effectiveness. back to footnote 2

 

1999 Report Home | Table of Contents | Previous Chapter | Next Chapter